Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 2421 - 2440 of 7,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
Background The Claimant, Mrs Tolley, born in 1952 and a British national, had paid National Insurance contributions from 1967–1984, and some further contributions thereafter until 1993/1994. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As there is no indication that the Legislature intended to restrict the applicability of the statute to the listed expense categories, the court will not create such a limitation (see Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 240). [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As there is no indication that the Legislature intended to restrict the applicability of the statute to the listed expense categories, the court will not create such a limitation (see Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 240). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
De plus, si l’on ne peut nier l’attrait du public pour la mode en général et les défilés de haute couture en particulier, on ne saurait dire que les requérants ont pris part à un débat d’intérêt général alors qu’ils se sont bornés à rendre des photographies de défilés de mode accessibles au public” [39]. [read post]