Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Sir Henry Brooke had a characteristically measured response on his blog pointing out the various “myths” repeated by the press. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 8:03 am
Brooke Henderson attended the virtual training. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 11:41 am
Brooke Henderson attended the virtual training. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Troxel v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
Brooke v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
Social media manipulation is an increasingly common form of extortion, according to a Brookings Institute Report. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
For better or worse, over the course of my career, I have had the opportunity to participate in the response to three financial crises – the thrift and banking crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s as a member of the staff of the Senate Banking Committee, the Global Financial Crisis of 2008 as Vice Chairman of the FDIC, and the three large regional bank failures in the spring of 2023 as FDIC Chairman. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Thanks once again to Kevin Brooks for compiling the cases in this post one last time. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Baye v Midland Credit Management, U.S.D.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Baye v Midland Credit Management, U.S.D.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Brooks, No. 05-4602, 05-4603, 05-4604, 05-4605, 05-4616 In a drug related prosecution, judgment is vacated and remanded in part where the court erred in declining a request that it give instructions requiring the jury to make an essential threshold determination of drug quantity and establish the penalty range for each individual conspiracy defendant, which resulted in a defendant receiving a sentence in excess of the maximum established by section 841(b)(1)(c). [read post]
