Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 207,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 8:23 am
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Reference to out-of-court statements A jury in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County convicted John Jennings, the appellant, of armed robbery, robbery, second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, and theft of property with a value of less than $1,000. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:59 pm
Did the trial court err in permitting the State to ask appellant “were they lying” type questions? [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
On March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Bond v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Bond v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
MARBUT, ROBERT CL CLARK, CAROL LATTA, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
During the oral argument at CAAF on Monday 12 December in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
AS and DD (Libya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national who challenged a deportation order made on national security grounds had to show substantial grounds for believing that if he was returned he would face a real risk of being subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in contravention of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2010] EWCA Civ 453;; [2010] WLR (D) 108 “When considering an award of exemplary damages in respect of the oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional conduct of government officials where the conduct complained of was considered by the court to be outrageous, it was not necessary to show further that the outrageous conduct disclosed malice, fraud, insolence, cruelty or the like. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:05 am
LO (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 164; [2011] WLR (D) 68 “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to hear a further appeal from the Special Immigration Appeals Commission only when there had been a final determination of the appeal to the commission and it had issued a decision as to the disposition. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Regina (C) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Secondary legislation laid before Parliament three weeks after a report sent by the Youth Justice Board to the directors of privatised secure training centres holding children, following two deaths in custody, was quashed as procedurally flawed and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
R (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 176; [2008] WLR (D) 85 “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of the case a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, whether because of the timescale envisaged or for lack of a right of direct access to a court. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
But, as the Ohio high court found in State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:15 am
GALBREATH v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (AM)(Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An asylum-seeker's in-country appeal against removal on human rights grounds could not be stifled by the later issue of a certificate by the Secretary of State for the Home Department that the opposition was clearly unfounded. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:59 pm
State Farm, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal explains the presumption of negligence in a multi-car rear end accident. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:46 pm
The trial court’s verdict, which had been affirmed by the appellate court, was thus appealed by the state high court as well. [read post]
