Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 12:57 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
To this end, contrary to OHIM's submission, case-law of the saturation of the state of art did not not assist in reaching that conclusion.The off-centre shaft in respect of the umbrella's canopy was not a dominant feature within the comparison of three asymmetrical umbrellas, said the General Court, which also declined to give greater importance to the underneath perspective of the umbrellas, in that design right protects the appearance of a product as it is reproduced… [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:29 am
In a recent court of appeals case, Grebing v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., Cal. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:06 pm
What safeguards are there that free speech considerations will not dominate MOPI’s development? [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
Ever since Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:26 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
My new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet the Court found one in Printz v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
At the end of the 19th century, the United States government was much smaller than it is today. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:40 am
” As it turns out, the Supreme Court agrees, holding in Comptroller v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
Tamanaha, Washington University School of Law (United States)16:00-16:30 Break16:30-18:00 Parallel Sessions I I.A Legal Pluralism in Africa· The Dominance of Legal Pluralism in a Post-Colonial South Africa: Where do We Stand almost Three and a Half Centuries after Western Legal… [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Starbucks' NOW logoIn this appeal to the Supreme Court, Starbucks (HK), who are broadcasters and not baristas, dropped a claim for infringement of a CTM for a device mark dominated by the word "NOW" with minimal graphical embellishment which was ultimately held invalid. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:55 pm
Heinz Company v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:59 pm
Indeed, Craig v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The website stated: “OTLA urges all association members and other eligible licensed lawyer to vote for the following candidates opposed to ABS” (OTLA Bencher Election Voting Guide). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:07 pm
Merriman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Board of Education and Loving v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Tomorrow’s arguments in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage dominate coverage of and commentary on the Court. [read post]
