Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 2421 - 2440 of 37,673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2020, 1:22 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The forecast shows 169,890 deaths in the US by October 1, with a possible range between 133,201 and 290,222. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
As Tim Cleary [the Hearing Officer in that opposition] said: "Notwithstanding the fact that the Opponent did not formally abandon the other grounds of opposition, namely those under Sections 6(1), 8(1)(b), 8(3)(b), 8(4)(a), 10(1), 10(3), 10(4)(b), 37(2) and 42(2) of the Act, I am satisfied that there is no need for me to give them any serious consideration [that's NINE grounds of opposition, raised for no good reason]. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:38 am by Jon Gelman
That approach continues to build on both the bedrock principles under which our current system has operated and the over 30 years of New Jersey precedent interpreting the Canons.Thus, as does the ABA Model Code, the Committee's proposal contains Canons that express general principles of conduct followed by rules that prescribe specific standards of conduct.As to the amendments proposed within this rulemaking, most of those are technical in nature, either eliminating cross-references to… [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:58 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The IRS claimed that it was within the 10-year statute because the limitation period was suspended for 241 days during the pendency of the collections due process hearing, as directed by Code §6330(e)(1). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
After recalling why droit d'auteur traditions have been traditionally wary of fair use, he explained why things have somehow changed: (1) civil law has moved to more open norms; (2) authors right systems have been moving away from natural law arguments to justify copyright protection; (3) fair use is not unpredictable [but it is not so widespread either: see map]; (4) fair use does not conflict with the Berne three-step test. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:32 am
Not quite 1 in 5 high-risk patients with heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) died on conference days, but 1 in 4 died on days when there was no meeting. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:10 pm
The reason is that filing it late doesn't stop the 10 year clock but does give you an appeal "equivalent" hearing and the IRS as an internal policy will usually stop collections anyway. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:56 pm by Marc Soss
The Act maintains seven (7) income tax brackets but lowers the income tax rates to 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37% from 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35% and 39.6%. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 2:00 pm by structuredsettlements
However, this § shall not apply to the association or any other entity which does not sell or solicit insurance. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In this decision the Board of Appeal is annoyed about the fact that a Rule 140 Correction of a decision of the Examining Division (signed by the whole division) and a Rule 139 Correction of an obvious error (signed only by the primary examiner in the opposition period, i.e. after grant; G 1/10 stopping this process was not yet issued) are not in the public part of the file.The Board sees the R.139 correction as not valid since no formally correct decision is taken; it would require… [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1986] 1 SCR 103 1. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:35 am by Jeroen Willekens
The range did not therefore result from an arbitrary selection.The range indicated in claim 1 was also narrow compared to the possible range for the device shown in figure 1 of E1.The range had to be appreciated also in combination with feature 3 of claim 1 which recited: "an electric power storage device (20) connected to the terminals in parallel with the fuel cell". [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Question #10 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Work Visa When does my time on my H-1B visa start? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Whether the criteria of exclusion is intersectional in nature, i.e. defined by another characteristic like age does not perforce justify that criteria as non-discriminatory upon any reasonable interpretation of Article 15(1).[16]Similarly, the argument that permission to enter other temples justifies denial of entry at Sabarimala is tantamount to saying that discrimination is not discrimination when made selectively. [read post]