Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 2421 - 2440 of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 8:22 am by Michael C. Smith
  But the issue presented here was a novel one - whether an article is “unpatented,” under the meaning of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Steve Dickinson and Grace Yang
The PRC government promulgated its Cybersecurity Law on November 7, 2016, with an effective date of June 1, 2017. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 9:38 am
The grease may be compared to a physical characteristic, such as a fingerprint or one's voice, which is 'constantly exposed to the public.', 410 U.S. 1, 14, 93 S.Ct. 764, 35 L.Ed. 2d 67 (1973). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Be prepared to call 9-1-1 and get the child to fresh air and deliver CPR. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
[Another study argues] for a figure closer to $1 trillion in today's dollars. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:09 am by CMS
It found that the UK’s implementation of the Principal VAT Directive does not result in the group being deemed to be a quasi-person. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm by Scott McKeown
The proposed rules also assign the burden of persuasion in relation to certain statutory and regulatory requirements for a motion to amend (i.e., 35 U.S.C. 316(d) or 326(d); 37 CFR 42.121(a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(1), (b)(2), or 42.221(a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(1), (b)(2)) to the patent owner, but permit the Board to exercise its discretion to determine that the motion to amend complies with the statutory and regulatory requirements of those sections even when the patent owner… [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
  It does mean necessarily the top rate would be reduced from 35 percent, so that would increase long-term economic growth, but the degree to which we can't say without more specifics. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Is the court second seised, when making its decision under Article 27(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, and hence before the question of jurisdiction is decided by the court first seised, obliged to ascertain whether the court first seised lacks jurisdiction because of Article 22(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, because such lack of jurisdiction of the court first seised would, under Article 35(1) of Regulation No 44/2001, lead to a judgment of the court first seised… [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:48 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
It is notable that the position in the case of an insolvent insurer, not being relevant in this case, was left open. (3) Limitation On the question of whether, assuming a breach of the safe port undertaking, the charterer is entitled to limit its liability for the insurer’s losses pursuant to section 185 and Schedule 7 Article 2(1) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, it was held that the CMA Djakarta [2004] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 460 was correctly decided: the ordinary meaning of… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 10:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Why $4,000: The USPTO has attempted to make clear that the $4,000 fee is set based on its "estimated average cost to the Office of performing the service" as required under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:36 am by Dennis Crouch
The final major element of the AIA is actual implementation of transformation of the prior art rules in 35 U.S.C. 102. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm by John Ehrett
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 15-41Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Claim 12 is directed to “The recombinant yeast microorganism of claim 1. [read post]