Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 2421 - 2440 of 3,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Laseur, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 504, 2003 SCC 54 (CanLII): There is no authoritative definition of chronic pain. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 6:48 am by Guest Blogger
The Boomers are expected to outspend their younger peers by over $1 trillion in 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
"); Document 54 ("WVGOP's filings have already exhibited a gross degree of intellectual deficiency" and "This Court should be ashamed of itself for allowing WVGOP to make a mockery of it. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:46 pm
For example, they suggest saving $54 billion from 2012-2020 by cutting spending on "graduate and indirect medical education. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:39 am
App. 1999), aff'd, 54 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2000)). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:27 am by Joe Kristan
Anthony Nitti, How Does a “Go Shop” Provision Impact the Treatment of Transaction Costs? [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
‘Thus, the law does not demand that the estimation of damages be completely free of all elements of speculation[,]‘ Delahanty, 318 Pa. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 10:10 pm
LEXIS 149 (November 3, 2008), released for publication January 13, 2009, certiorari granted, No. 31,430, December 30, 2008: [*31] Third, the State argues that New Mexico's historical treatment of pretext claims does not justify our departure from Whren. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
That compares with 668 in 2022, 361 in 2021, 197 in 2020, 54 in 2019, and 0 in 2018. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 5:49 pm
  Yet, in the end, the character of African states' engagement does nor appear to have changed much. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
Thus, in determining whether Section 514 was constitutional, the Court examined these two aspects under Turner I: (1) whether in enacting Section 514, the Government addressed a substantial and important governmental interest that alleviated a real harm, supported by substantial evidence; and (2) whether Section 514 was narrowly tailored to advance that interest.1. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:49 am by The Legal Blog
" In that case the Court was considering the importance of rights under Section 5A vis-`-vis Section 17(1) and Section 17(1)(A) of the Act. [read post]