Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
Harrington won in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
Previously, he had headed a State-owned company. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am
But the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
By failing to produce the AG's Opinion in English, it is withheld not only from the English and Irish contingent, but from nationals (and courts) in many other states who can read decisions in English but cannot read them in (say) Latvian.The failure of the court to produce an English translation, or a French translation, of a critical opinion is ludicrous. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Mr Moulton’s lawyers argued that the lack of a remedy for police maladministration meant that English law ran contrary to human rights law. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 1:45 pm
Bowen, 485 F.2d 1388, 1388 (9th Cir. 1973) (Chambers, J., same); United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
In John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am
To evaluate this argument the Judge first assessed the current state of the UK market. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:13 am
Randell QC stated that it was common ground that the burden of proof was on St Andrew's to show that Smyth's partner had deliberately started the fire. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) as constitutional in Oil States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Ruling unanimously in Densmaa v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states, the court… [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:38 pm
United States. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:51 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 7:31 am
Only minimal docket information is available to the public via the Internet.In the federal case, the copy of the Proposed Order was filed as an exhibits to a "Notice of Additional Authority" and there is no express motion or request to the federal judge presiding over the CFPB v NCSLT action for judicial notice of the order issued in the parallel state court proceeding. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:01 pm
"Beautiful use of historical citation by Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the plurality in United States v. [read post]
