Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
This article is completely distinct from the book.The second is The Gendered Origins of the Lumley Doctrine: Binding Men's Consciences and Women's Fidelity, which appeared in the Yale Law Journal 101 (1992): (1992):The English case Lumley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
Validity in a licence dispute in the English courts governed by English law concerning a US patent? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:28 am
Nor of State v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:25 am
Negron v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 7:06 pm
In Egbule v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 3:16 pm
Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:48 am
The wife made an application to the English court for financial provision after a marriage had been dissolved in a foreign country, under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
It had pointed to the English criminal case of Oxford v Moss (1979) 68 Cr. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
” With these words Lord Sumption begins the systematic demolition of an edifice first constructed in 1908 in Poulton v Adjustable Cover and Boiler Block Co, and subsequently extended in Coflexip v Stolt (2004), Unilin v Berry (2007) and in this case, Virgin v Zodiac (2009). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:08 am
These two papers are: V. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Mr Knowles began by explaining that the form of joint enterprise in question, Parasitic Accessorial Liability or “PAL”, was a distinct form of liability established by two cases, Chan Wing Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and R v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:32 am
Lessons from English v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:50 am
See also Graham v. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 2:37 pm
I mean she L-O-V-E-S turkey. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 2:37 pm
I mean she L-O-V-E-S turkey. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:53 am
Shashoua and another v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada is hearing Prime Minister of Canada, et al. v. [read post]