Search for: "German v. German"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 5,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 5:31 am
— Continuing its trend of picking very niche copyright cases, on Monday the Supreme Court granted cert in Varsity Brands v Star Athletica, concerning the copyrightability of cheerleader uniforms. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
The case we always cite in California is Stangvik v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am
Infringement of EU law and the duty of using the legal remedies pursuant to Art. 34 N. 1 Reg. 44 / 2001 The Dutch Hoge Raad in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
Scope and Impact of Safe Harbors Official description: Scope of entities and activities covered by safe harbors; incentives (and disincentives) for creators, copyright owners, online providers, investors, and users; impact on licensing activities; effectiveness of remedies, including ability to proceed in federal court in case of disputed notice or misrepresentation; economic impact on creators, copyright owners, service providers and copyrighted works; relevant empirical data; and other… [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:00 am
Toronto author sends copy of Anne Frank's Diary to German pirate, after copyright complaints https://t.co/ztQfUSf3wv -> Toronto author sends Anne Frank's diary to German politician after copyright complaints https://t.co/9KxvMprXGO -> Google AI gains access to 1.2m confidential NHS patient records https://t.co/TvMC0Tqhcf -> The gavel gamble: Litigation emerges as an asset class https://t.co/mYCrkkQLrG -> Case Law: V v Associated Newspapers… [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/cS9G3Dfywn -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-04-26 https://t.co/PErzvsVpbu -> New Zealand term extension estimate clearly inaccurate says study https://t.co/6vYvJuxEhJ -> $1 damages awarded for breach of confidence Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. v Schad, 2016 ONSC 2297 -> MPA: No single tool to fix piracy -> Mississippi Attorney General Withdraws Google Subpoena -> Ready, set, litigate: Judge sets time limits for Oracle v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 pm
In Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Labels Switzerland an Internet Piracy Haven https://t.co/8xUwN6kjun -> Intellectual Property Disputes in the UK: the Court of Session https://t.co/Asikj2fWVk -> New EU Trade Secrets Directive approved by Parliament: the secret is out https://t.co/xhCK5K9m0p -> Federal Appeals Court Set to Issue One of the Most Important Privacy Rulings in a Generation https://t.co/LVUSKCALJZ -> No privacy law means cloud tech is still in the air here https://t.co/Eq7kFQyeYH -> Computer and Internet … [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Lingering Doubts, Trade Secrets and Copyright PreemptionMike Mireles explores the overlapping IP rights that protect software in the United States.Patentability of user interface designs - Part 2 of 2: the German approach Mark Schweizer analyses the case law from the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) and compares the German and EPO approaches to patentability of user interface designs. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
You must use your real name https://t.co/zImAg8i7Et -> News Corp lodges fresh antitrust complaint against Google in Europe https://t.co/hGKSpB1pum -> Defective Call-to-Action Dooms Online Contract Formation–Sgouros v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. [read post]
Litigating Platform Liability in Europe: New Human Rights Case Law in the Real World – Daphne Keller
22 Apr 2016, 3:33 am
Estonia and MTE v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm
The German federal constitutional court “ruled that critical antiterrorism laws were partly unconstitutional and demanded tighter control of surveillance. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:13 pm
Dietz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am
Still, though this rule may not crop up often, if at all, in a family law case, it is still a rule and understanding it may help an attorney whose client is undergoing some form of physical or mental evaluation to be familiar with the Court’s holding in Shearer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am
Still, though this rule may not crop up often, if at all, in a family law case, it is still a rule and understanding it may help an attorney whose client is undergoing some form of physical or mental evaluation to be familiar with the Court’s holding in Shearer v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
.
Amandine Métier (Véron & Associés), Thomas Misgaiski (HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER) and Vittorio Cerulli Irelli (Trevisan Cuonzo) had the pleasure of being joined by Judge Peter Blok of the Court of Appeal in The Hague to explore the CJEU's ruling on Huawei v ZTE, the national aftermath and the Judge's perspective. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:19 am
In Bernstein v. [read post]
