Search for: "Goldman v Goldman" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 8:17 am by Travis Crabtree
Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled that when a company took over a departing employee’s LinkedIn account, the company did not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the case of Eagle v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 12:47 pm
(an image of Snoopy at his typewriter with the caption "gradually a shot rang out" graced the Shell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:29 am by SHG
I've gotten some ribbing from lawyers because of my representation of the defendant in Stern v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am by Eric Goldman
Most of it was inside baseball, but the law contains an interesting if limited attempt to statutorily accommodate orphan works. * Goldman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 Eric Goldman explains well in this 2009 post about another case Pearson and other publishers brought at the same time, Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
 Eric Goldman explains well in this 2009 post about another case Pearson and other publishers brought at the same time, Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 As usual, Eric Goldman gets that, too: In a subtle opinion with potentially significant implications, eBay has preserved most of its big 2008 district court victory in the long-running Tiffany v. eBay case. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]