Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 5,732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 12:39 am
The decision in in the 'Jersey Boys' case which has been covered by this blog here and here: Corbello v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
While acknowledging the success of the law in greatly increasing the number of African-American and Latino elected officials, Chief Justice John Roberts contended in his majority opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The trade mark holder hopes that consumers will use the products identified by the mark, including the hashtag slogan; he can build upon the hashtag slogan to redirect users to the company’s website and social networks, where their brand allegiance can be reinforced. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
Holder, 831 F. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:50 am
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock Trademarks and Domain Names * TheDomains: .Sucks Releases Pricing With “Premiums” For Trademark Holders Up To $2,499 A Year. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
v=fB_FZa8SNic [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
He said he struggles to hold down a job and can't work in hot conditions.You can, if you are interested, see some of the photos mentioned in the article above here. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Judgment of the President of Court of First Instance of Antwerp (Belgium), 15 January 2015, docket number 14/4305/A, Katrijn Van Giel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
SPOCK: He did not pay royalties. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 9:01 am
For anyone looking for recent evidence and analysis of courts' application of ebay v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:26 pm
” Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Since the Klass and others v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Zest IP Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Cir. 2014) (“[T]he patent holder should only be compensated for the approximate incremental benefit derived from his invention. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:26 am
He was also taken to court in Sweden over copyright infringement.As said above only one question was referred to the ECJ: "May the Member States give wider protection to the exclusive right of authors by enabling “communication to the public” to cover a greater range of acts than provided for in Article 3(2) of [Directive 2001/29]? [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
Via Meriem Loudiyi (INLEX IP Expertise, Paris) comes news that this Kat didn't spot himself, though he wishes he had. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
The McRO (Planet Blue) v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
As the opinions in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
In the case of GEICO v. [read post]
