Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 17,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Commentary The Supreme Court’s decision will be closely scrutinised by representatives of the transport industry and passenger groups alike, and may well come to play an important role in the pending appeal in Thibodeau v Air Canada, soon to be heard by the Canadian Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 3:41 pm
  That is true even though courts otherwise have broad discretion in imposing sentence under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq., as modified by this Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am by Jack Kennedy, Olswang LLP
Stage 5: The Supreme Court On 14 and 15 October 2015, the Supreme Court heard an appeal from the CMA. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Green v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 11:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the pending copyright case of Star Athletica v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:19 am
In Gard Marine & Energy Ltd ( A company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda) v (1) Lloyd Tunnicliffe (2) Glacier Reinsurance AG (A company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland) (3) Agnew Higgins Pickering & Co Ltd [2009] EWHC 2388 (Comm), the English Commercial Court was asked to consider whether the dispute between Gard and Glacier Re should be heard by the English courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:03 pm by Philip Thomas
That sound that you just heard was the jaws dropping of lawyers all over Mississippi in reaction to the Mississippi Supreme Court's decision in InTown Lessee Associates v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
If you heard the sound of groaning on Monday morning, it was probably this Kat's desk struggling to support the immensity of the latest offering of Mr Justice Arnold, adjudicating a leviathan struggle between Idenix and Gilead. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:48 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Most of the speculation focuses on whether the Supreme Court will issue a sweeping constitutional ruling like it did in the 1967 Loving v Virginia case [invalidating state laws that prohibited interracial marriage]. [read post]