Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2015, 1:02 pm
Maybe they're worried about escapes. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
(Of course, there are countervailing interests on the other side as well; you don't want a hospital, for example, firing more effective doctors merely because they're minorities. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
By contrast, the California Court of Appeal is willing to take a risk, and publishes this opinion by Justice Hoch.An opinion that's totally right.Damn her.You're not allowed to recover attorney fees if you're a lawyer or law firm engaged in self-representation. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 4:41 pm
Res ipsa. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:59 pm
If you’re a litigation or appellate lawyer, you’ve probably already read about Burlage v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
See In re Andrews, 52 P.3d 656 (Cal. 2002). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:00 pm
Cal. ret., who's known Justice Lui since elementary school), and Jones Day's Christopher Lovrien (who noted that when he asked about Justice Lui's most difficult oral argument, he responded that it was testifying at Justice Gilbert's confirmation hearing!)... [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:10 am
"If they're stupid questions — and I occasionally, like all judges, ask stupid questions — that's the best question of all, because you get a chance to point out, 'Well, actually, that's not this case.'" [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 1:52 pm
We're looking forward to the next 200. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
Cal. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:33 am
Next, in an anti-SLAPP appeal here, sanctions are not imposed, but could have been:In view of the absence of a request for sanctions by PAAMCO and the general principles that sanctions for frivolous appeals “should be used most sparingly to deter only the most egregious conduct” (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 651), and that “[c]ounsel and their clients have a right to present issues that are arguably correct, even if it is extremely… [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm
Cal. 1996). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:15 pm
Of course, if the Supreme Court issues its ruling and re-institutes the stay of the Regulation, then Cal/OSHA will not pass its regulation. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 1:03 pm
The world's top universities have come late to the world of online education, but they're arriving at last, creating an all-you-can eat online buffet of information. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:15 am
Cnty. of Santa Barbara, 328 Cal. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:41 pm
Cal. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm
Even if you're a smart attorney. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 2:00 am
Cal. 2007) D. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
Barnes, 2014 WL 2811832 (Cal. [read post]
