Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 12,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
In fact, in his tribute speech to Justice Scalia last year, Judge Gorsuch embraced Justice Scalia’s philosophy of judicial restraint: “If you’re going to be a good and faithful judge, you have to resign yourself to the fact that you’re not always going to like the conclusions you reach. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:00 pm
Only unlike his majority opinion in Stenberg v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:46 am
As the Court itself notes, understanding the economic contribution of women to the household also has immense potential in re-shaping our understanding of division of matrimonial property. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
The chief justice has the final opinion of the day, in Nieves v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
The treatise is a genre of text we’re familiar with today and it’s a genre of text we’re accustomed to turn to when we need answers about the law. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:09 am
"You're trying to get these cases dismissed and that's not justice. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
In the “we’re just doing this for giggles” department is State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:15 pm
In our detailed summary of the underlying facts and lower court opinions in In re Marriage of Tiballi, we wrote that the question presented was whether a parent who voluntarily dismisses a custody petition can be hit with the full amount of the fees of a court-appointed child psychologist. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:16 am
" Which, in my opinion, is utter crap, and not at all credible. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:59 am
The enormous length of modern opinions means the justices aren't writing about the particular case. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In a stunning display of judicial activism, two conservative judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia re-wrote several recent Department of Defense regulations, a sixty-year-old Act of Congress, a basic principle of federalism upheld by dozens of Supreme Court opinions, and millenia of common law to dismiss the Saleh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am
But that was made clear in the majority opinion, in what Justice Harlan called the "critical" point of the majority opinion: It was "a person in a telephone booth" who "may rely upon the protection of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
” Briefly: At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion for the court this term in Buck v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm
Justice Doi Todd instead writes a cogent, coherent opinion that explores this issue meaningfully, ultimately holding that, yep, the sentence may well be unconstitutional, remanding the case back down to the trial court to reconsider the sentence.It's an unusual case. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
Coverage of and commentary on Tuesday’s orders and opinions continue. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
The fate of the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
Indeed, the point of disagreement with the concurring opinion in Jones was the re-emergence of a trespass theory for Fourth Amendment searches rather than application of existing reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:17 am
Edwards, No. 07-208, drew a vigorous dissenting opinion from Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 5:33 am
" In re A.B. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 1:54 pm
Only Justice Few accepted my argument. [read post]
