Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C" Results 2421 - 2440 of 9,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2019, 5:19 am by Gordon Ahl
Jacob Schulz also posted court filings that indicated the D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:23 pm by Kevin Goldberg
You might have thought that I was talking about the Washington, D.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
Benjamin Wittes discussed Attorney General Merrick Garland’s decision to appoint a special counsel to oversee whatever potential criminal matters that might arise out of the presence of classified documents in President Biden’s Delaware home and office space. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 7:16 am by Elliot Setzer
Setzer also shared the Justice Department’s brief urging the D.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
Officer Stu Pid in D.C. ought to remain anonymous for a reason. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm by Richard Primus
  What I know is that he is a white man in his early fifties, raised in Denver and D.C., who attended a series of elite universities and has since inhabited the world of the coastal legal elite (whether in D.C. or back in Denver). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Importantly, payment was not expressly contingent on compliance with this requirement and the invoices submitted by Triple Canopy did not specifically mention marksmanship matters. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:36 am by David Rivkin and Andrew Grossman
Grossman practice appellate litigation in the Washington, D.C., office of Baker & Hostetler LLP. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm by Amy Howe
For the rest of the nation’s capital, yesterday’s elections may have been the week’s headliner, but inside the Supreme Court the main event came today, as spectators – including retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the D.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Waxman of the Washington, D.C., office of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: Following the NLRB’s expansion of the definition of “joint employer” in the high-profile Browning-Ferris case and the employer’s subsequent appeal to the D.C. [read post]