Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2007, 7:38 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell has claimed its first victim. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
We're already missing paeans to the name partners' "coveted," "extremely prestigious" clerkships, as well as encomiums to their stints at Sullivan & Cromwell, "one of the most prominent Wall Street law firms," where they represented "many of the world's largest corporations," and "any number" of corporate executives. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
We're guessing Gallion is representing Grinberg in connection with Sullivan & Cromwell's internal investigation. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 5:50 am
We're going to hold off on preparing a more elaborate chart until the final figures are in. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 5:24 pm
Okay, folks, we're signing off for now. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 8:48 am
We're having major computer troubles once again. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 9:25 am
We're happy to report that we have some new material for you. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:13 am
We're monitoring coverage of this lawsuit through a news feed. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:02 am
UPDATE: Heh: "Once Instapundit gets done explaining to Andrew Sullivan what Instapundit's position is on the surge, perhaps he can tackle the thorny question of telling Andrew Sullivan what Andrew Sullivan's position on the surge might be. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 11:58 am
We are not yet the #1 Google result for either aaron charney or charney v sullivan & cromwell, but we're getting there. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 9:21 am
While we're gone, please feel free to share your thoughts on Charney v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:09 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell, we will keep open for a while (at least through the weekend). [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Read Exhibit C to the Charney Complaint (PDF) re: Kodak's complaints regarding fees and overstaffing. [read post]