Search for: "J. C." Results 2421 - 2440 of 19,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 4:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
(iii) C must in fact have relied upon the common assumption rather than merely upon C’s own independent view of the matter. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:43 am by Russell Knight
” Cook County Court Rule 13.5(a)(ii)(c) At this point, the stipulation is signed and final documents are signed. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
P., Upadhyaya, S., Wang, X., & Yoo, C. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Circuit case for the proposition that "[J]udgment on the pleadings is not appropriate if there are issues of fact which if proved would defeat recovery, even if the trial court is convinced that the party opposing the motion is unlikely to prevail at trial. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
See, e.g., Zango, 568 F.3d at 1178 (Fisher, J., concurring); Berin Szoka & Ashkhen Kazaryan, Section 230: An Introduction for Antitrust & Consumer Protection Practitioners, GLOB. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
According to the complaint, Amazon acts as a “distributor,” as defined by CPSA, of its FBA products by: (a) receiving delivery of FBA consumer products from a merchant with the intent to distribute the product further; (b) holding, storing, sorting, and preparing for shipment FBA products in its warehouses and fulfillment centers; and (c) distributing FBA consumer products into commerce by delivering FBA products directly to consumers or to common carriers for delivery to… [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
Pataki (1999): [J]ust as the First Amendment protects a legislator's right to communicate with administrative officials to provide assistance in securing a publicly funded contract, so too does it protect the legislator's right to state publicly his criticism of the granting of such a contract to a given entity and to urge to the administrators that such an award would contravene public policy. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The claimant brought a claim in (a) libel; (b) harassment; and (c) for breach of the GDPR against ‘Person(s) Unknown’ defined as being the authors, editors and publishers of the website. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:26 pm by Ralf Michaels
dziernika 2019 r. w sprawie BGL BNP Paribas SA c/a TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C? [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:11 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Ct. 1720, 1720 (2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (noting that Janus "casts significant doubt" on Keller). [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 8:09 am by Eleonora Rosati
The Court did not follow this argument.The Court, referring to the Opinion of (then) AG Jääskinen in case C-5/11, stated that copyright “remains, notwithstanding progressively closer harmonisation, largely governed by national law. [read post]