Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 13,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 12:43 pm
In Perdomo v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
In Bluman v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
Kreimer, Lines in the Sand: The Importance of Borders in American Federalism, 150 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:26 am
I do have a dispatcher back on line. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
Recognizing this burden, and the unfairness of foisting it on an unwilling defendant, the Court of Appeals has repeatedly reversed cases where an affirmative defense was imposed on an unwilling defendant (see e.g., People v Bradley, 88 NY2d 901, 902 [1996] [extreme emotional disturbance]; People v DeGina, 72 NY2d 768, 776-777 [1988] [entrapment]).New York Affirmative DefensesNew York Penal Law Article 40 groups the general affirmative defenses that apply to… [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 1:29 pm
Pelletier v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Medellin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:32 am
But he says in this case, the judge’s ruling is in-line with the accepted standard.... [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:39 pm
The case is entitled Reiseck v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 1:36 pm
Pelletier v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
Despite the narrow reading of § 330b, the opinion draws a useful line between real-life harm and virtual harm. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
Maybe not.The case is Selevan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Bottom line, if you want to stop outbreaks earlier (less people sick - and less lawsuits) and get the right product identified as the culprit, put money into public health – PERIOD. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm
Jachimiec v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:01 am
Some people have unkindly suggested that the harmonised IP laws of the European Union bear the same relationship to real law as the paintings of Salvador Dalí occupy with regard to reality. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am
The 1963 Sherbert v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
Lord Reed adds a further category of persons to whom a “less stringent approach” to precariousness might be appropriate: people who “might be under a reasonable misapprehension as to their ability to maintain a family life in the UK”. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 6:49 am
But supposedly some people weren't carrying their weight. [read post]
