Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
The UK House of Lords has also said in Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) that a situation where the executive never enforces a statute while continuing another legislation can never arise. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
He pointed out that democracy in this country resided in 2 Houses, one of which was unelected, he mentioned whips, members of the Church sitting in the House of Lords ex officio, the executive being the major power in the land, and the fact that departments of state were the ones who ran the ministries. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
♫ Oh, Lord, stuck in a lawsuit again. ♫Fraud. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:35 am
[My take on On Fire Christian Center, Inc v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Lord Leggatt in Lloyd emphasized the spirit of flexibility of representative actions. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report on Large Language Models has concluded it is not “fair for tech firms to use rightsholder data for commercial purposes without permission or compensation, and to gain vast financial rewards in the process”. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
In the first, Tower Hamlets v The Times, the newspaper was ‘ordered’ to publish a summary of the adjudication. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm
The first instance CJ stated he followed Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880 and Lord Wright: The liability for a nuisance is not, at least in modern law, a strict or absolute liability…he is not liable unless he continued or adopted the nuisance, or, more accurately, did not without undue delay remedy it when he became aware of it, or with ordinary and reasonable care should have become aware of it. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
As Lord Kitchin stated, Dr. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
The March 7, 2012 Court of Appeals opinion in Crossland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
In the courts: The Mayor of London v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
That decision is now been appealed to the Lords, to be heard in July 2009. [read post]
