Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2024, 10:59 am
That is contrary to the judgment of Ward LJ in Manchester CC v Finn (2002] EWCA Civ 1998, (2003] HLR 41; and the observations of Lord Neuberger in Knowsley Housing Trust v White (2008] UKHL 70, (2009] 1 AC 636 (both of which I cite below). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm
” As it happens, the case involved cartridges sold by Lexmark both in the United States and overseas. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley & ors, heard 7-8 June 2011 (Eady J) [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
That is one of the issues that Madam Justice Fitzpatrick was asked to decide in Tassone v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:15 am
New York : Facts On File, 2012 3 v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:52 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
Lord Chancellor Eldon said, in Beer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Last month a three-judge panel consisting of Lords Neuberger, Reed and Carnwath refused leave to appeal, stating: "Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court at this time bearing in mind that the case has already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal". [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Managing Intellectual Property had a bit of a scoop this week, picking up very quickly on the news that Lord Younger of Leckie, the current Minister for Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom, announced that his government had no plans to introduce an IP Tsar along the lines of the apparently successful Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm
Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-897 (ITC July 30, 2014, Order) (Lord, ALJ). [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
