Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Offending Party Action in Question ERISA Section Penalty As of August 15, 2016 Penalty Effective August 16, 2016 Employer   Failure to maintain records or furnish information sufficient to determine benefits 209(b) $11 per employee $28 per employee Plan administrator   Failure/refusal to file annual report (Form 5500) with DOL 502(c)(2) $1,100 per day $2,063 per day Administrator of multiemployer plan   Failure to certify endangered or critical (funding) status  … [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
But regardless, as a matter of constitutional avoidance, the court should address the interpretation of 10 U.S.C. 949(j)(a)(2)(A) before addressing the ripeness issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Brian Cordery
More from our authors: Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses by Jochen Bühling (ed.) [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:42 am by Steve Vladeck
(Rule 32(j)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires the court to “advise the defendant of any right to appeal the sentence. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
  Henderson J noted that this was a highly fact-specific issue which was unlikely to be suitable for summary determination. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Cir. 2016) is not that the court found IV’s content identification system patents invalid as claiming ineligible subject matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
., “CELEBRASIANS, ASIAN EFFICIENCY, … NAACP, THINK ISLAM, NEW MUSLIM COOL, MORMON SAVINGS, JEWISHSTAR, and PROUD 2 B CATHOLIC”). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
” The views of Isaiah Berlin are also pertinent: “what matters is not the form of restraints on power…but their effectiveness. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Whilst his judgement is likely to be influential, it is nevertheless striking that another judge took the opposite approach, so the matter cannot be regarded as fully settled, and it is appropriate to analyse his reasoning in at least a little detail. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm by Orin Kerr
Given that a Tor user has not voluntarily shared his IP address, it doesn’t matter that obtaining an IP address from a third party or a visited website would not be a search in other circumstances that did involve voluntarily sharing. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:02 am by Tod M. Leaven
  There are specific criteria which need to be met, but once met this system allows a more just compensation. [1] 38 CFR 3.321(b)(1). [2] Johnston v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:02 am by Tod M. Leaven
  There are specific criteria which need to be met, but once met this system allows a more just compensation. [1] 38 CFR 3.321(b)(1). [2] Johnston v. [read post]