Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 2421 - 2440 of 20,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2008, 8:44 am
So in this case, the claim count doesn't matter - but only because all claims were under the split point. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:22 am by Robert Kraft
B-2 Visa If your relative doesn’t plan to stay in the U.S. permanently, they may get quicker entry with a B-2 visa. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 9:02 am by Sam Brunson
Submitting the returns to the full House would, presumably, make them a matter of public record, and allow us, too, to inspect them. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm by Ira Meislik
The following year, the Federal Trade Commission adopted Regulation B, implementing the Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:22 am
And that isn't necessarily an outcome that you want to encourage. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am by David Fraser
” That category is described by the [Restatement (Second) of Torts (2010) at 652D as follows: “One who gives publicity to a matter concerning the private life of another is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if the matter publicized is of a kind that (a) would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (b) is not of legitimate concern to the public. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Stating an opinion about the merits of an issue or the claim by itself isn’t disqualifying per se, but additional facts might establish grounds for disqualification. [read post]
Rosenstein’s order says that: (b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Neither is being in a sexual relationship in which a person who is already married to A says, “I’m committed to this woman [B], I’m going to take care of her for the rest of her life. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:16 pm
  Thoughts It seems that the last word has not been yet spoken  in the matter and the industry awaits (if not expects) an appeal of the Court’s ruling. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The plea concerning Article 7(3), which excludes the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) if the trade mark has acquired distinctiveness through use, was declared inadmissible, as the Board of Appeal had not ruled on the matter, but merely remitted the question to the Examination Division. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this communication, the Examining Division held that the subject-matter of the independent claims on file lacked inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC.III. [read post]