Search for: "MATTER OF C M R" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Justice Moreno posed the question whether all that was at stake was "the M word. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm by Berin Szoka
If Smith were still alive today—telecommuting from a coffee shop in Glasgow on his iPad, no doubt—I’m sure he would be the first to applaud BITAG and what it means for the future digital “Wealth of Nations. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
For the answers, look no further than last month’s unpublished decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Vito M. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Here are ten of those expired tax provisions that might matter to you: Educator expense. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 5:06 am
" Sort of like I’m sure we are going to hear in regards to Delhi. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:26 pm
"[C]ourts have regularly held that a single brand, no matter how distinctive or unique, cannot be its own market. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:45 pm by Kevin Goldberg
(In fact, I’m guessing that CRB’s final decision won’t appear until mid-December, which would be consistent with its timing in Webcasting III, when a decision for the 2011-2015 term was issued in December, 2010. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Since I'm not a Public Trial Clause expert, I asked a couple of people who were, and they graciously responded and allowed me to quote them. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:19 am by Christopher G. Hill
 Our topic was Building Information Modeling (BIM), the ever-present trend in the A/E/C industry. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 11:03 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
(*Note: I’m not going to address section 1031 issues here because it’s beyond the scope of this post and because it’s disallowed for cryptocurrency under the new tax reform law. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Seventh Circuit (2021) (Easterbrook, J.): I'm still here, guy. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am by Guest Author
  Yet, in support of the FCC’s attempt to avoid a vagueness attack through its generic “context matters” approach to defining indecency – an indefensibly inconsistent approach that Justice Kagan justly summarized as, “nobody can use dirty words or nudity except for Steven Spielberg” – the chief justice made a telling slip of pronoun: “All we [sic] are asking for, what the government is asking for, is a few channels where you can say… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
To determine whether the district court properly dismissed a claim based on a forum selection clause, the appeals court turned to the Supreme Court’s decision in M/S Bremen v Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]