Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 42,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2013, 7:44 pm
It must also be evidence that may affect the ruling had it been put before the court at the first instance. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:11 pm
Assuming the Panel finds the matters qualify for consolidation, a key issue is the court in which the matter will be consolidated. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
I sat through the trial, heard all of the evidence, and have not conducted a lengthy hearing on the Rule 60 motion. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
We have not received sufficient evidence to this effect, and it is simply unnecessary to make such a ruling today. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
Although the timing of the decision is uncertain, State District Judge Seeley will now take the matter under advisement, review the evidence, and make a ruling. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
When performing its review, an appellate court should evaluate the entire record and all evidence received is to be considered, whether or not the trial court's rulings thereon were correct. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
Discovery can be obtained from non-parties using subpoenas. . . .Again, getting back to the opinion, the judge then explains that theFederal Rules of Evidence outline the test for `relevant evidence:’`Evidence is relevant if:(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.Federal Rule of Evidence 401. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:57 am
In Olsen, the issue had to do with a violation of the Brady rule, thus prejudicing the defense who went to trial without knowing about this exculpatory evidence. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:35 am
Compare this ruling to the Fourth Department's recent decision in Matter of GEICO v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
That rule accords with the principle that the People's disclosure obligations under Brady extend beyond matters that tend to establish defendant's innocence and include material evidence that impeaches ‘the credibility of a prosecution witness whose testimony may be determinative of guilt or innocence’ (cites omitted)…It is not determinative that the prosecutor denied any contemporaneous actual knowledge of the eyewitness's criminal… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
The Court noted that as a historical matter, there is strong evidence that similar statements were admissible at common law. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:33 pm
Additionally, NOx react with other chemicals in the air to create other harmful pollutants, like fine particulate matter and ozone. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
Rule 801(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence states, “Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:49 pm
Here, the court stated, the evidence did not compel finding in favor of plaintiff as a matter of law. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
“Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by [the New Jersey rules of evidence] or by other law. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 10:45 am
The government should not have tried to “push the envelope” in this matter. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
Hutchinson, again acting as her own attorney, appealed this ruling and the Indiana Court of Appeals held in her favor. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
" To make matters worse, the EN to 8205 states that it covers all hand tools not included in other Headings of Chapter 82. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:25 am
Coming into force in two years, the December 27, 2008 Ontario Gazette lists several amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure including: RULE 4.1 DUTY OF EXPERT Duty of Expert 4.1.01 (1) It is the duty of every expert engaged by or on behalf of a party to provide evidence in relation to a proceeding under these rules, (a) to provide opinion evidence that is fair, objective and non-partisan; (b) to provide opinion… [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
" Actually, the law has started to move away from the rigid rule of the line of cases and toward the principle of considering all available evidence, including any available extrinsic evidence, to effectuate the intent of the testator. [read post]
