Search for: "MR"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 127,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
This post is based on a Wachtell memorandum by Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
This post is based on a Wachtell memorandum by Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Sirras, Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
Sirras, Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:11 am
Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
Recall that Stevens is arguing in defense of the total voting exclusion he wished to keep in the proposed amendment as section three, even though enforcing the voting ban would require implementing legislation concerning legislative apportionment, voter registration, and other such matters: The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:54 am
Mr Babayev argued that his criminal conviction for preaching and conducting Friday prayers had been an unjustified interference with his right to manifest his religion that had not been prescribed by law and had not been necessary in a democratic society [64]. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Mr Mu [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 11:20 am
Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:18 am
Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
Mrs. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Horvath, Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Horvath, Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:10 am
While Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:10 am
The complaint alleged that given the circumstances and infirmity of the client, Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
’ Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
The Wall Street Journal in September 2023 editorialized against applying Section Three to disqualify Trump, saying that "[i]t is surely relevant that Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
There were multiple other probable causes of damage to Mr Fox’s reputation, including his own tweets and public comments on racial issues. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King and Lords Justices Arnold and Birss) Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc and another [2024] EWCA Civ 29 (26 Jan 2024)In Trade Marks - Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe I discussed Mr Justice Miles's judgment in Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc and another [2023] [read post]
