Search for: "Majors v. Smith" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
Legal and Regulatory Developments SPOTLIGHT: Insider’s Report On Payments: Interchange in the CrosshairsThe Green Sheet – April 12, 2021 The major card brands are on the hot seat. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Graham Smith has a piece dealing with the “more ticklish points of interepretation” of the Investigatory Powers Act. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  The physical intrusion alone, the majority said, was sufficient to show a search occurred. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
Writing for the majority at Ontario’s Divisional Court, she said the arbitrator’s decision was reasonable. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Schachtman
The vast majority of cases never go to trial. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:57 am by Alfred Brophy
  Watchman’s Atticus is utterly representative of the majority of the South’s lawyers when it was drafted. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am by Dylan Gibbs
Writing for the majority at Ontario’s Divisional Court, she said the arbitrator’s decision was reasonable. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  It might well be true that many members of the public – perhaps even a majority – would have preferred a different plan of government had one been available to them. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Speaker Williams, who goes by his first name Rob, is often confused with Jim Miller, who has insisted that he is not in fact Speaker Steve Smith. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
As for the defendant’s Eighth Amendment claim, the court determined that sex offender registration was not a “punishment” pursuant to Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Major General Paween Pongsirin says he fled for his life after he found out senior figures in the military and police were involved in the trade. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm by administrator
[xv] The final major challenge in proving that police used excessive force is collecting the necessary evidence. [read post]