Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
After taking the matter under advisement, the trial court denied Compton's motion.Compton v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
This approach may be successful on those specific facts (I don’t really want to adopt a view on that), but I don’t think it typical of the situation in general.And I don’t think it should be overlooked that even when a product cannot be defined structurally, there are other means of characterisation that should be preferred over product-by-process definitions.One Anon answered his own comment:First comment:Crystalline form of compound X obtainable by crystallisation from methanol,… [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:26 pm
I’m far from expert about the law of statehood, so I’m reluctant to comment on the international-law debate. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:59 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, February 24, 2020, at 11:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will host an event to discuss the Libyan civil war. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
– I’m here to tell you: It matters, and it matters a great deal. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Douglas M. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Defendant Paul M. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
§ 78u-5(c). [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:06 am
Mendelson and Linda M. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
(Now I’m really confused.) [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
Well, Justice Alito then simply asserts, as if night followed day, that "[c]ompelling a person to subsidize the speech of other private speakers raises similar First Amendment concerns" (emphasis added, and citing three modern cases, including Abood, that are no more explanatory than Janus). [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:22 am
Periods of time in deferred action do, however, qualify as periods of stay authorized by the Secretary for purposes of sections 212(a)(9)(B) and (C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [INA]. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 9:55 am
" I’m not 100% sure what this means. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 12:40 am
The author welcomes this innovation for German law in non-litigious matters as there is an increase of cross-border disputes in this subject matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:20 pm
(see section 6.1(b)) under a plain reading of the E.O.Perhaps Addington means to suggest that because at least one section of the E.O. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 5:48 pm
c. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Craig M. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:22 pm
R. 201(b)(4) A spouse can object to having their phone or computer searched, however. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
Events driving derivative litigation include: sexual harassment; data breaches; privacy violations; M&A transactions; public, workplace and product safety; and antitrust, FDA, FCPA, FCA and other regulatory issues. [read post]
