Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
Washington offered tentative praise for the new cabinet, with State Department spokesman Matthew Miller saying the presence of Gazan-born ministers was an encouraging sign that the cabinet intended to be “fully representative of the Palestinian people. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge in Maryland this week followed through on a previous warning to sanction a lawyer best known for representing Rep. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
 Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
 Since 1994, VAWA has broken new ground in federal and state responses to domestic violence, sexual as [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]