Search for: "Orin Kerr"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 3:59 pm
[A new lecture on a recurring topic.] [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
I've blogged on these issues, and here's an article on them.I recently posted to SSRN a new draft artice, "Compelled Decryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination," forthcoming in the Texas Law Review. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:06 pm
[A subtle change, but a real one.] [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:32 pm
[A big problem in a small section, but one that can be corrected.] [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:44 pm
[Motion to suppress granted. ] In a new decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
[A massive amount of complex material; here's how I decided to present it.] [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:41 pm
[They're up, as you might guess.] [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:43 pm
[A thought on the old days.] [read post]
30 May 2024, 1:02 am
I'm pleased to be able to post the cover of my forthcoming book, The Digital Fourth Amendment, which will be published this fall (or thereabouts) by Oxford University Press. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 11:49 am
I'm pleased to say that you can now pre-order my book, The Digital Fourth Amendment: Privacy and Policing in Our Online World. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
[Ex ante restrictions are back, and they're still causing trouble, now in United States v. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court handed down Byrd v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm
[A second post on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] I posted yesterday about why I wrote my new book, The Digital Fourth Amendment. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 3:29 pm
[The first in a series about "The Digital Fourth Amendment. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 1:35 pm
[Just posted to SSRN.] [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:06 pm
[A useful overview. ] In trying to understand the many constitutional issues raised by Trump 2.0, I have found Jack Goldsmith to be a particularly informed guide. [read post]
1 May 2025, 5:29 pm
[For those who listen to their books rather than read them.] [read post]
2 May 2025, 6:13 pm
[Fifteen judges produce eight separate opinions—but no view gets a majority.] [read post]
12 May 2025, 6:09 pm
[Now up to date.] [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm
I think that's right in the sense that CFAA was not drafted with that use case in mind, and the court cites Orin Kerr's article on trespass[8] extensively in support of that reasoning (a point I come back to below). [read post]
