Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
Well, precisely that has come to pass. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
In American Center for Law and Justice v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Which brings us to Wilson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
At least as a formal matter, ZTE is deeply embedded in transnational soft law standards for business conduct. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Holder v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
Learn more about your rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am
Even at this early stage, the use of occasional strong words (by English standards) provides a hint as to the ultimate outcome. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
A glimpse into that future may be found in Buckley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
.[*]In “Facebook v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
This closely resembles Article 8(1) ECHR which provides that restrictions on the right to privacy must be "in accordance with the law" - a formula which has been used by the ECtHR in cases from Klass v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:57 pm
By Andrew DelaneyTaylor v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
" So if the constitutional meaning of this provision cannot be determined with reference to how the People of New Hampshire would apply it in any concrete case - because that it not a knowable standard to use - what does it mean? [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:41 am
In Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, the Court of Justice of the EU held that a court of a Member State can order platforms not only to take down defamatory content globally, but also to take down identical or “equivalent” material. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
" So if the constitutional meaning of this provision cannot be determined with reference to how the People of New Hampshire would apply it in any concrete case - because that it not a knowable standard to use - what does it mean? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
"[16] So if the IRS wants to deny tax exemptions to groups that spread certain ideas on the grounds that those groups are too "emotional" rather than "intellectual" or "rational" in their arguments, it must apply precisely the same standard to all groups—animal rights groups, pro-life groups, pro-gun-control groups, and more. [read post]
