Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2012, 5:30 am
Lyndhurst v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:58 am
In December 2011, a district court in New York City ordered the Taxi and Limousine Commission to make the taxicabs in New York City accessible to people using wheelchairs. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:31 am
Exercising licensing and regulatory authority Noel v NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission, USCA, Second Circuit, Docket 12-41-cv Justia posted the following summary of a decision by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
In the low hills of Texas people talked straight. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
In the low hills of Texas people talked straight. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
Given the the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
Thus while she was bound to follow Rodriguez, it was not a complete answer to the Plaintiffs' challenge. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
In Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
People with capacity are entitled to make decisions for themselves, including about what they will and will not eat, even if their decision brings about their death. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
Francis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
We have to abandon the the idea of a global community of public legislators that autonomously and independently issue coercive norms that bound their citizens, and shift to a complex picture where coercive measures are the product of the encounter between the private and public, or between private actors more and more integrated on a global level. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am
Questions of family law, community government, criminalisation and counter-terrorism are by now so tightly bound up in one another that it is hard to tell where one ends and the other begins. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
For folks interested in any aspect of healthcare law, this conference is highly recommended; the panels are strong on substance, the people are unfailingly collegial, and the event is bound to be near you at some point, as it moves to a different law school each June. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
This is the odd question addressed in the Supreme Court's decision in Parker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
As many people understand, child support is always modifiable. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
