Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
May 18, 2023) More Posts About Keyword Advertising * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:22 pm
You may recall a "John Doe" case against 38 different "John Does", LaFace v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:56 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
The ruling marks a departure from prior decisions considering whether law enforcement can force people to provide biometric passcodes in light of the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee that an individual may not “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:45 pm
I argued in 2008 that when deciding Katz at least some of the Justices may have had, in the back in their minds, the then-widespread police practice of spying on men in public toilet stalls to detect homosexual sodomy. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
In the recent Oracle v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:28 am
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
Sometimes the police may also issue a ticket for 39:6(b)(2) simultaneously. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
(See People v Casey, supra; see also People v Miles, 64 NY2d 731 [1984] [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Pietrylo v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 8:29 am
The grant of an application for stay by a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in Trump v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:19 pm
Here is the opinion in Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:19 pm
Here is the opinion in Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 11:40 am
Case Citation: Doe I v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:52 pm
The Court of Appeals, in People v Luciano, 2008 NY Slip Op 04898 [6/3/08] has held that forfeiture or permeptory challenges is a permissible remedy for attorneys who exercise peremtory challenges in violation of the constitiuion under Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986] and its progeny. [read post]
