Search for: "People v. Part" Results 2421 - 2440 of 25,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:23 am
  (That's the benefit, I imagine, of paying almost all of your people minimum wage and having them work part-time.)That leaves, however, eight employees who were shorted for twelve total time periods. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
An unfortunate part of my job is to have a court officer seize assets from people who refuse to pay the judgments that are placed with us for collection. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:09 pm
An unfortunate part of my job is to have a court officer seize assets from people who refuse to pay the judgments that are placed with us for collection. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Last week's post discussed People v Jones (2015 NY Slip Op 09773), in which the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction in the interest of justice due to numerous acts of prosecutorial misconduct in summation which were egregious, but largely unpreserved by timely objection. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:02 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Last week's post discussed People v Jones (2015 NY Slip Op 09773), in which the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction in the interest of justice due to numerous acts of prosecutorial misconduct in summation which were egregious, but largely unpreserved by timely objection. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by James Eckert
We don't see misuse of NYCTA MetroCard charges very often, but the Court of Appeals decided such a case today in People v Hightower (#223 decided December 23, 2011). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am by Vikram Raghavan
In this two-part synopsis, we focus on amendments made to the criminal law framework relating to sexual violence. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Even though these measures have failed to protect Americans’ privacy (as I explained in Part I of this series), they still far exceed the protections established by EO 12333 and its implementing policies. [read post]