Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples" Results 2421 - 2440 of 72,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 9:08 am by Indefensible
Hat tip to Simple Justice who had this nice post on the recent decision in People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
Appeals Court Says Swearing In Text Messages Isn’t a Crime :: People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:36 pm by Glenn Reynolds
UPDATE: Or, if you don’t have time, here’s reader Fred Seisel’s summary: “Bain Capital v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thereafter, the County Court permitted the People to elicit from their own witness, a police detective who had administered a polygraph examination to the defendant, that, based upon the graphs produced from such examination, it was his opinion that criminal defendant was not telling the truth during such examination when he denied having committed the crime charged. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:49 am
  Others would perceive the opposite.Ultimately the plaintiffs don't get any relief.But they definitely had neutral people hear and think about their case.A lot. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:27 am
Nonetheless, when I read opinions like this one, I have a hard time figuring out which one I abhor more: the disgraceful rich people (like Swartz) who purchase these abusive tax shelters or the disgraceful rich people (like KMPG) who create and sell them.Tough call. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:06 pm
None of this is or should be about Russia or the Russian people. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 pm by Human Rights at Home Blog
This week the Supreme Court denied cert for a case that sought to chip away at the rights gained for LGBTQ+ people in Obergefell v Hodges. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:23 pm by Patent Docs
Both these thoughts come unbidden when reading the Federal Circuit's decision on June 16th in Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
Furthermore, the attorney's conduct did not consist of "egregious and prejudicial error such that defendant did not receive a fair trial" (People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713 [1998], citing People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 188-189 [1994]), but rather "viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal[s] that the attorney provided meaningful representation" (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). [read post]