Search for: "Pool v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At On the Docket, Stephen Saltzburg highlights some of the questions remaining after the court’s decision in Kansas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Bailey and Timothy Caulfield state, One concern that consistently emerges in relation to obtaining genetic information is the worry that an individual may be discriminated against on the basis of his or her genetic make-up and, specifically, on the basis of a predisposition to a certain condition or disease. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 1:18 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers should examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Yusuf, No. 07-3308 Unpaid taxes are "proceeds" of mail fraud for purposes of sufficiently stating an international money laundering offense. . [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
An obligation to state the date or the day does not imply, according to the ordinary meaning, that it is necessary to state the hour and, a fortiori, the minute. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:20 am
On April 30, 2007, the United States Supreme Court gutted the United States' Patent System in a case called KSR Interneational Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by David J. DePaolo
Supreme Court ruling from 10 years ago called Hoffman Plastic Compounds Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
CAfA’s 223 arbitrators have extensive experience with dispute resolution, and specialization in areas such as art authenticity, restitution of cultural property, insurance or sale transactions related to fine art – to name a few.[12] Another unique feature is that CAfA assembles an “Expert Witness Pool. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
Two justices, Justices Stevens and Alito, do not participate in the cert. pool. [read post]