Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 2421 - 2440 of 55,693
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Examples of other cases granting injunctions to restrain dilution or elimination of equity interests and associated rights outside of the cash-out merger context include the following: Spivak v Bertrand, 147 AD3d 650 [1st Dept 2017] [“Without the preliminary injunction, plaintiff will be irreparably harmed, since his shares . . . will be automatically transferred . . . and he will be stripped of his voting power and decision-making rights”]; Datwani… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:22 am by Eleonora Rosati
Oh, how times have changed.The US Supreme Court’s decision in eBay v MercExchange (2006) meant patents were no longer exclusive rights by definition and the implications and wisdom of that shift have been vigorously debated. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Vasiliki Kosta
Matters changed with the Lex CEU case and subsequent ECJ judgment in Commission v Hungary, finding a violation of Article 13 CFR. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Lauren Stiller Rikleen
”But they turned out to be no match for a Justice with a belief in the power of precedent and a strong spine. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:45 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Power Imbalance Another important factor is the balance of power between the parties in the agreement. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:36 am by Cari Rincker
However, if you wait until you are on your deathbed to make those gifts, they will still be included in your estate under some circumstances because they are not considered “completed” gifts under federal tax law.[1] A recent case, Estate of DeMuth v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Murals often serve as powerful expressions of a community’s identity, history, and cultural diversity. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
” Since he didn’t supply the requisite authorizations by the delineated deadline and provided no “reasonable excuse” for that lapse, the AD2 thought the case’s dismissal was appropriate under the circumstances.He clearly needed to unconditionally comply with that conditional order ….# # #DECISIONM.V. v. .R.U. [read post]