Search for: "Roberts, Board v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 2,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Regents, academic freedom is “a special concern of the First Amendment. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian covers the latest delays in the defamation trial between ex-soldier Ben Roberts-Smith and the Age, Canberra Times and Sydney Morning Herald over allegations that he committed war crimes while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The lesson being if you are going to die, die in Indiana.Raskopf cited the case of CMG Worldwide v The Upper Deck Co., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:26 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Board of Education, which was decided only a month before she was born. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
His medical training included a year as Chief Resident and a Fellowship in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
After a lengthy interlude, along comes Magid v Magid, 2017 NY Slip Op 32603(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 14, 2017]. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am by Robert B. Milligan
 In light of these and other continuing developments in non-compete law, employers should periodically review their existing agreements and on-boarding procedures to maximize the likelihood that their agreements will be upheld. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
This state­ment of principle expands the “jump” principle, which, at common law, holds that successive sentences imposed on an adult offender should be increased gradually rather than by “jumps. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]