Search for: "Russell v State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell also represented the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
United States, Holland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:53 pm
Russell Feingold of Wisconsin. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
[Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Krupski v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:42 pm
- Boise attorney Chuck Peterson on Peterson Law Offices' Idaho Criminal Defense Blog David v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the United States (recommending a limited grant) Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: Pendergrass v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm
Even though the Supreme Court held in 1982 that a state cannot discriminate against undocument children in public school education (Plyler v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am
Thomas No. 09-940, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am
[Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represented the respondents in Yousuf.] [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 8:27 am
In Carr v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Lance, Assistant Attorney GeneralRepresenting Appellee Russell Nomura: David M. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
Yesterday forty-eight states – all save Virginia and Maine — filed an amicus brief in next Term’s case Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
That will have to be sorted out first in the lower courts, the Court said in deciding Samantar v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:00 am
LEXIS 50549 (ED CA, April 27, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's claim that he was restricted from practicing his religion, Asatru.In Russell v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
” Bill Mears of CNN reports on the decision in United States v. [read post]
