Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 2421 - 2440
of 6,068
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 7:52 am
Bierman, Jacob Geesing, Pratima Lele, Tayyaba C. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
John’s Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am
In 1970, the DOL issued a regulation that defined “salesman” to mean “an employee who is employed for the purpose of and is primarily engaged in making sales or obtaining orders or contracts for sale of the vehicles . . . which the establishment is primarily engaged in selling,” 29 CFR Sec.779.372(c)(1). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
§512 [http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512] Goldman’s 512(c) Cheat Sheet 155 UMG v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
C-567/14 | Life as an IP Lawyer: Dusseldorf, Germany | ISP's delay in removing content can remove safe harbour | Avengers: when is confusion not confusion? [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The Tribunal issued its reference decision, Kobo Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
Hart v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
Garrett's cell phone "the police found text messages discussing the sale of a $300 Macy’s gift card for cash or drugs. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
In addition, promotional items bearing the roundel were provided to dealers as part of the manufacturer's efforts to encourage the sale of genuine parts, and would be passed on to non-authorised dealers, who would pass them on to customers, which further complicated the matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
A recent case, Belot v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Morgan Stanley Detected the Online Sale of Its Client Data. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:46 am
The Owners and TCPL agree to equally share (50/50) the cost to remove the improvements;(c) The Owners covenant and agree that upon the Owner’s sale or disposition of the Lands, the Owners shall fully disclose the restrictive covenant to any prospective purchaser.A letter containing those terms was registered on title to the property, but the Plaintiffs did not otherwise advise the Defendant of the letter or the subsequent litigation between TCPL and… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
The May 31, 2016 cert petition in the case of Fried v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
John C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
John C. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
