Search for: "Sealed Defendant"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
Although the defendant argues that the disclosure of the test result could harm his reputation in the community, this argument must be weighed against the fact that the order of the court granting such a test and all related papers would be sealed by the court. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
., Appellee. 5th District.Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Fraudulent transfers -- Trial court improperly denied motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction a complaint filed against defendant, an out-of-state resident, under Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, because a fraudulent transfer is not a tortious act for the purposes of Florida's long-arm statute, and additionally because plaintiff failed to specify where the alleged fraudulent transfer occurred or that… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:35 am
So many lawyers were misinforming their clients about deferred expunctions, that deferred probation cases in Kaufman County now have a separate plea form that informs all Defendants that DEFERRED PROBATION CASES CAN NOT BE EXPUNGED, ONLY NON-DISCLOSED (some call this “sealed”). [read post]
31 May 2014, 2:18 pm
Furthermore, these sealed records may be made available only to the defendant or his designated agent. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
The trial court correctly allowed the state to use the defendant’s sealed record for an extremely limited purpose in a subsequent criminal case (which the prosecutor conceded has now been dismissed for want of prosecution). [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:51 pm
However, sealing of the case is stayed for thirty (30) days to allow the People to serve and file a sufficient information, should they chose to do so. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:02 pm
“Defendant Stewart Parnell has failed to show good cause why the document should be sealed,” argues K. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:38 am
The defendant was charged on August 2, 2013, and pled guilty on September 23, 2013, although the plea agreement remains under seal. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:47 pm
Samsung case, Apple was seeking some gradual improvements but more than anything else sought to defend the verdict, while Samsung wanted the jury to be overruled or, in the alternative, a retrial. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:48 am
To exercise such power, the court should use a balancing test which weighs the privacy interest of the defendant against the government’s legitimate need to maintain records of criminal proceedings. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:03 pm
Government attorneys say the sealed evidence shows the former PCA executive’s “motive and intent. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:48 pm
No defendant or defense counsel is present. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:01 pm
“The court has been advised that the defendant(s) will be pleading guilty pursuant to a plea agreement,” says the scheduling order. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:37 am
App Defendants: The App defendants also raised standing arguments, but the analysis differed slightly between the court’s discussion as to Apple and the discussion as to the app defendants. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:42 am
After accepting the terms of the disclaimer, you need to enter into the search form the Defendant's last name and first name. [read post]
18 May 2014, 3:52 am
Grand jury proceedings are entirely protected from the public, and any documents citing to them are sealed by statute. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:39 am
Among them is setting up a procedure where Financial Advisors (stockbrokers) can seal and expunge their records: i.e. have the complaints taken down. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:33 pm
Colton pleaded guilty under seal to the charges on September 13, 2010. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:54 pm
Blackman Court Discusses Section 160.50 of the CPL to Determine Whether the Defendant’s Record should be Sealed The defendant requested to seal her record and to return her prints pursuant to section 160.50 of the Criminal Procedure Law. [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:49 pm
We certainly would expect no less, but when all was said and done, the district court granted summary judgment on all but one claim: A UCL claim based on label claims regarding antioxidants because the plaintiff said that he viewed the defendant’s “antioxidant seal” and “that he would like to see certain disclosures on mint products. [read post]
