Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 8,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 6:20 am
”“We appreciate that the jury understood what we had gone through, and I think they were saying to the entire country that we can’t allow this to happen to hard-working, small business people whose lives are defined by their business, their family, and their community,” he said. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:16 pm
In assessing the appropriate amount of damages, the Court considered that only a small group of people heard the comments, the comments did not adversely affect Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:23 pm
Think of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:27 pm
Ct., Bronx Cty., Part 92) (Justice Troy Webber); People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:31 pm
(Id. at p. 671; see also People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:27 am
In PDS Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
As someone who is appalled by the excessive power held by small states, including those whose politicians I generally like and agree with, I see no strong reason to support giving the roughly one million residents of the District of Columbia the same voting power as the many states that would be larger. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
The statements, widely quoted, were also tinged with irony, a large dollop of poking fun, and a bit of reaction:When asked if he thought China’s relationship with the US should be adjusted as globalisation has come under pressure, Xi said: “More than 10,000 people fly between China and the US on a daily basis, which is about 4 million [people] a year. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:44 am
v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:41 am
For example, a patent on the basic practice of letting people access content in exchange for watching an online ad was upheld in court before Alice. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
