Search for: "State v. Cash " Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 4:35 am by Shane Smith
With much of the nation’s attention on South Carolina, I thought I would address this state today in my series on calculating actual cash value. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
Free Speech Paternalism and Free Speech Exceptionalism: Pervasive Distrust of Government and the Contemporary First Amendment , Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 76, 2015, U of Alabama Legal Studies Research Paper No. 26557000, Ronald J. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:16 am by Larry
They show the truth of the old adage that bad facts make bad law.The first is United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Local authorities are coining it in, in a short-sighted race for cash by ‘regenerating’ social housing. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: The Adoption by International Tribunals of a Substantive/Transactional Approach to Res Judicata—A New Paradigm in International Dispute Resolution? [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
  As the story unfolds and details the Korematsu litigation, Cash is faced with exactly that decision – one that certainly calls to mind Dale Carpenter’s account of Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Patents The 1949 Act, which was a masterpiece of simplicity, had a couple of provisions that always seemed to me to be quite advanced: one was the facility to get an extension of term if exploitation of the patent had not turned out to be profitable on account of the War or if there had been other genuine reasons for not being able to cash in on it. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Opponents cite the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision a year after Litle in Nixon v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
(d) A member state can refuse “social benefits to economically inactive Union citizens who exercise their right to freedom of movement solely in order to obtain another Member State’s social assistance although they do not have sufficient resources to claim a right of residence”: Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig C-133/13, [78]. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]