Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 2421 - 2440
of 10,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employees
19 Nov 2010, 5:21 am
Employee organization may not rely of a FOIL request to obtain the names of charter school employeesMatter of New York State United Teachers v Brighter Choice Charter School, 2010 NY Slip Op 08383, Decided on November 18, 2010, Court of AppealsThe New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) filed a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request with six Charter Schools* seeking, among other things, payroll records showing the full names, titles, corresponding salaries, and home… [read post]
10 May 2009, 11:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Brooks, partner, and Samantha E. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:02 pm
Subsection (e)(2)(B) of that law provides, among other things, that the federal court “shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 4:05 am
” McCaughtry v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:49 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled otherwise. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Eric E. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Eric E. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:41 pm
Tooley v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
Smith (OR) John Ensign (NV) John E. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 8:23 am
B. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Statutory presumption that an individual suffered a disease of the heart as a result of the performance of duty rebutted by medical evidence to the contraryMatter of Lawless v DiNapoli, 2008 NY Slip Op 09335, decided on November 26, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRobert E. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
The trial court’s order denying Father’s motion for reconsideration stated that “[b]ased on the arguments of counsel” the motion was denied. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:18 am
In interpreting a prior version of Act 312, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 8:38 am
The Court applied the test set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Newfoundland and Labrador v. [read post]
