Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 2421 - 2440 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Thompson There are lawyers I know who would happily subscribe to this view in the current state of the legal services ‘market’;   cunningly being farked up by our political masters,  egged on by a herd of shield munching beserkers on the Tory backbenches. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:10 pm by Professor Ann Powers
The district court then erred in its mootness analysis, ruling that the Master Complaint was moot as a result of post-commencement compliance, stating that plaintiffs were “not seeking the type of civil monetary penalties that saved the Laidlaw case from mootness. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
In an endorsement made on November 25, 2011, I allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the Master and stated that written reasons would follow. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Ariel Katz
The complaint alleged “systematic, widespread, and unauthorized copying and distribution of a vast amount of copyrighted works”, and argued that GSU “has facilitated, enabled, encouraged, and induced Georgia State professors to upload and post to these systems - and Georgia State students simultaneously to download, view, print, copy, and distribute - many, if not all, of the assigned readings for a particular course without limitation. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am by NL
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
On 8 May 2012 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls and Laws LJ) gave permission to appeal in the case of Coulson v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
In Parts IV and V, I draw upon unpublished sources regarding the 1930s Advisory Committee's decision not to provide for a judicial officer who would have the authority to rule on the admissibility of evidence during the deposition. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Body Masters Sports Industries, Inc., 784 A.2d 1178, 1183 (N.H.2001), the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected the Third Restatement because of the alternative design issue. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]