Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 19,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
MGN challenged the decision in Campbell v MGN (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) on Article 10 grounds. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
It is a strong rule both domestically and in European jurisprudence and can only be displaced by unusual or exceptional circumstances . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
We just got back from visiting the Supreme Court, where we hung out with the (sizable and growing) crowd of people camped out at One First Street, so they can get seats in the courtroom for tomorrow's argument in the D.C. gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:07 am
Authority of the arbitratorKimball v Pine Plains CSD, 272 AD2d 332Kimball involves two common proceedings brought pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR]: one to confirm an arbitrator’s award; the other to vacate the award. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:04 am
The following is my tentative list of chapters for the new Part V; I am interested in suggestions both with regard to what is there that shouldn't be and what is not there that should.A positive account of Property RightsA World of Strong PrivacyProblems with Ayn RandNational Defense: Further Thoughts on a Hard ProblemMarket Failure, Considered as an Argument For and Against GovernmentLessons from Other Legal SystemsCapitalist TrucksThe Economics of Virtue and ViceThe Weak… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
During argument in Parker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
TLT Construction v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 11:13 am
Here is the abstract: This symposium article questions the significance of the partial justification v. excuse distinction often discussed with respect to provocation, noting that the doctrine inevitably has elements of both. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:57 am
Here's the abstract:This paper, presented to the 25th Sokol Colloquium on Private International Law in April 2012, and slated for publication in a forthcoming book resulting from the Colloquium, discusses the International Court of Justice’s judgment in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:05 am
In Reaching Hearts International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:47 am
DRUNK DRIVING - EVIDENCE OF PARTITION RATIOPeople v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:57 am
But reporters should always be cautious about advocacy groups' summaries of cases in which they have strong beliefs. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Dinnen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Webb v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:45 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
NSA, and Jewel v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
And here's what I wrote 16 years ago (when GWB needed to fill a Supreme Court seat):Jeffrey Rosen re-airs the topic of "super-stare decisis" -- the notion that the precedential value of some cases is especially strong, perhaps so strong that you ought to have to agree in advance not to overrule them to win confirmation to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:36 am
In line with Thoma v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
