Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 7,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Sveen v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:19 am
PUMA’s anti-discrimination provision provides, “[u]nless required by federal law or required to obtain funding: … No employer may refuse to hire a person or may discharge, penalize or threaten an employee solely on the basis of such person’s or employee’s status as a qualifying patient. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
More than a year later, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the May 2014 Order (Gershman v Ahmad, 131 AD3d 1104 [2d Dept 2015]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:33 am
They rented two U-Haul trucks, which they fully loaded with their belongings—including all the children’s belongings—and they sold or gave away anything that did not fit into the trucks. [read post]
Repeat After Me: You May Not Expel a Member of a New York LLC Unless the Operating Agreement Says So
17 Sep 2018, 3:25 am
Peter Sherwood’s ruling last month in Matter of Goyal (Vintage India NYC, LLC), 2018 NY Slip Op 31926(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 7, 2018]. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
China may well become Europe's greatest pupil. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:57 pm
See SCF Waxler Marine, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Under Internal Revenue Cоdе ѕесtіоn 6331, thе Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Sеrvісе саn “lеvу uроn аll property and rіghtѕ to property” of a taxpayer whо оwеѕ Federal tаx. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
Even Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:42 pm
S. 209, 235–236))Wages*Shields v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm
The Aftermath of South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:03 am
In May, the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:19 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
JMW 75 LLC v Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 31945(U) August 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156352/2017 Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
REV. 991 (2018); U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-12 Excerpt: Parts I, II, IV and V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Chemical Foundation, 272 U. [read post]
