Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
In State of Hawaii v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Rule 23(b)(1) cases are relatively rare–the Rule is typically invoked to resolve competing claims to a particular piece of property or an identifiable set of proceeds such that a declaration of one person’s rights necessarily resolves the rights of all other members in the class. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 7:31 pm
Shapiro: This is a legal case, not historical debate, and state law cannot cloud title on already annexed land. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
July 21, 1998); United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
The County Executive (I don't know why the court put that title in all caps in the opinion) relied on a U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:27 am
Liebermensch (2008) 45 Cal.4th 344, where the parties’ signed purchase contract was silent as to the length of the escrow period.Defendants Morris and Zita Liebermensch owned a condominium unit that Plaintiff Sunil Patel was interested in leasing. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:21 pm
For example, in In re Crevier, 820 F.2d 1553 (9th Cir. 1987), the Ninth Circuit ruled that the debtor who mortgaged a residence after filing chapter 7 bankruptcy petition failed to state a cause of action under TILA because title to residence vested in the bankruptcy estate and debtor could not convey a security interest therein. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:42 am
The questions before the court are whether the random drug testing policy adopted by the Board as a state actor violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article III, § 6 of the West Virginia Constitution, and the right to privacy as it is recognized in this state. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
., All Rights Reserved. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:58 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Public Privacy Interests I. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States, 2002 “[The patent system] added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius in discovery and production of new and useful things. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:14 am
Because this invitation is made in cases in which the United States is not itself a party, the Court gains the benefit of an (ideally) neutral perspective on whether the petition is the right vehicle to address a particular question of federal law. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(United Systems of Arkansas, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:50 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
Coming soon… Max Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To acquire or dispose of an asset, including real or personal property in this or another state, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, and to manage, develop, improve, exchange, partition, change the character of, or abandon an estate asset; v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
By Glen Hansen In Zanelli v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:45 pm
Yes, you read that right: by allegedly violating KY law, the state can move to have property used in these unlawful acts transferred to the state. [read post]
