Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The Court concludes therefore that there is insufficient evidence to show general causation.Federal and State Courts have consistently determined that the cause or causes of MCS (IEI) cannot be reliably established by scientific proof (see, e.g., Oppenheimer v United Charities of NY, 266 AD2d 116, 698 NYS2d 144 [1st Dept 1999]; Frank v State of New York, 972 F Supp 130 [ND NY 1997]). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:27 pm
On Tuesday of this week, while the rest of the United States is going to the polls, the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Surprisingly, but thankfully, the New England Journal of Medicine felt so strongly about the effort to shield pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers from liability, they filed an unsolicited brief with the United States Supreme Court in a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
The classification system should reflect the nature of the units being classified. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:08 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
The United States presented no r other evidence to controvert that offered by Knellinger. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
“When I got to the United States Senate and went on the Judiciary Committee as a young lawyer,” he began, “I was of the view . . . that the only thing that mattered was whether or not a nominee . . . had a judicial temperament, had not committed a crime of moral turpitude, and was — had been a good student. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Since the 1970's when the Supreme Court of the United States decided that lawyers could advertise (Bates v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
" In a 1993 decision, Herrera v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
Cavel International v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:46 pm
Farley, under the specific facts of his case, is so grossly disproportionate to his crime as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.... [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
In Cuellar v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
