Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 26,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
United States, 560 U.S. 605, 618 (2010). [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm
And while the court recognized the First Amendment rights of noncitizens currently present in the United States who limit their online speech because they may need to renew a visa in the future, it held that the federal government’s regulation of immigration should be granted significant deference. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm
United States (12-158). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:58 am
On Appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 2770 The Appellant is a national of Rwanda who had been granted indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
However, while the case was pending, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that speech made pursuant to an employee's official duties could no longer be the basis of that employee's claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
2 Mar 2020, 8:29 am
4 Nov 2024, 9:32 am
In Urquieta v Bowe, --- F.4th ----, 2024 WL 4630284 (United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2024) Petitioner-Appellant Maria Elena Swett Urquieta (“Swett”)1 appealed from an order of the United States District Court denying her petition for repatriation to Chile of her minor son S.B.S. from the United States, where S.B.S. was wrongfully retained by his father, Respondent-Appellee John Francis Bowe. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
On June 25, the Michigan Supreme Court held an application for leave to appeal in abeyance because it appeared that a case pending in the United States Supreme Court, Chaidez v United States, may resolve an issue presented in the application. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 7:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2004, 6:02 am
granted Aug. 2, 2004), and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:05 pm
(See Love v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
