Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 1:03 am
The roundtable discussion was on the recent decisions of Nigeria’s Supreme Court (SC) in Adeokin v MCSN and Compact Disc v MCSN on the locus standi (right of action) of collective management organisations (CMOs) under the Nigerian Copyright Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
Totenberg alluded to a recent interview in which Ginsburg opined that the United States was not “experiencing the best of times. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
While the latest version also does not apply to “lawfully present” immigrants, a prior draft only excepted valid visa holders, which would have barred most refugees, asylees, and asylum seekers, all of whom are authorized to live and work in the United States, from renting business space. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
In Virtual Works, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
[T]he United States [FDA] requires the tablet manufacturers . . . to account for and warn of a drug’s properties. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
On May 29, 2020, the Supreme Court denied an injunction in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
In the Apple v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
United States, 672 F.3d 1309, 1323 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
The Copyright Act explicitly states that works of artistic craftsmanship are protected as artistic works. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:20 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:53 pm
Under the so-called “waiver doctrine” of the “law-of-the-case doctrine,” an issue that a party could have raised in an earlier appeal in the case, but that was not raised, is barred from consideration (see United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
U.S., U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In Beltran v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
